Which reality? That is i guess the essence of my argument.
I find it hard to believe that all data that supports the widely accepted GW-theories is somehow incorrect, nor do i believe that you could apply some objective process of elimination, and only remain with data that does not support those theories.
Note that i'm trying really hard not to get stuck in specific details of the GW debate. It's really the decision process that intrigues me here.
No matter what decision is made, there will always be people who think it is the wrong choice, but perhaps we could at least agree on a sort of system by which to make decisions.
A bit like democracy, we may not always agree with the outcome, but most people will agree that as a system, it's acceptable.